"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 008901c2a2a8$9d1af430$1d00a8c0@pdimov2">news:008901c2a2a8$9d1af430$1d00a8c0@pdimov2... > From: "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > * Is there a reason for operator!() when we have the safe bool? > > > > > I left it because shared_ptr has it. > > I figure that there must be some contexts where the safe_bool conversion > > doesn't work. > > Borland doesn't like boolean expressions that involve a safe bool. > shared_ptr::operator! is an implementation detail; it is not needed on a > conforming compiler. > I see. Thanks.
-- Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
