Hi Boosters, given the Standard's wording in 3.9/1:
"... There are two kinds of types: fundamental types and compound types. ..." isn't the current implementation of is_compound overly complex? Can't we just change it to basically match: is_compound = !is_fundamental given a working version of is_fundamental of course, but this seems easier than providing an always safe and portable is_class or other stuff required for the current version. Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], web: http://www.aixigo.de _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
