Re: [boost] Proposal: Identifying libraries

[Beman Dawes]

At 08:59 AM 12/17/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:

>From: "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> At 01:10 PM 12/16/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
>>
>> >but how does this affect (implementation detail) headers that aren't
>> >necessarily part of a specific library?
>> boost/detail/lightweight_mutex.hpp,
>> >boost/assert.hpp, boost/throw_exception.hpp, for example.
>>
>> Good question. It seems to me every header should have a home
>> library. Probably "utility" for your examples.
>
>My concern is that "utility" would be listed as a dependency, and this
>isn't really the case.

Good point. Maybe the default should be to report dependencies on a per library basis, but that there was a way to say "report this one on a per header basis."

--Beman


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost