> > Were talking exclusively about reflection now... I don't want this muddled
> > with the serialization discussion. They are separate topics. :-)
> >
>
> Perhaps, but it would be quite disappointing if after going to the
> whole trouble of implementing a reflection framework, we ended up with
> one that was not usuable for basing a serialization library.

I agree. My intention isn't to stifle discussion, only try to avoid
confusion. Serialization and/or persistence is a primary motivator for me,
so if it fails to do this, I would consider the project a failure.

--craig

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to