> > Were talking exclusively about reflection now... I don't want this muddled > > with the serialization discussion. They are separate topics. :-) > > > > Perhaps, but it would be quite disappointing if after going to the > whole trouble of implementing a reflection framework, we ended up with > one that was not usuable for basing a serialization library.
I agree. My intention isn't to stifle discussion, only try to avoid confusion. Serialization and/or persistence is a primary motivator for me, so if it fails to do this, I would consider the project a failure. --craig _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost