Harri Hakula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 09:06 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> "Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Is this that same definition of B0? Where is that coming from?
>>
>> Oh, yeah, that's right!
>>
>> The mac headers seem to have
>>
>> #define B0 0
>>
>> somewhere :(
>>
>> It's easy enough to check in a workaround, but it would be nice to
>> track down the cause...
>>
>
> On my Jaguar OS X 10.2.2:
>
> File "Space:usr:include:rpcsvc:rex.h"; Line 82: #define B0 0
>
> Amusingly, next define is
> #define B50 1
> (I guess THAT one has not caused any problems yet...)
What (in heck) is rex.h?
Matt, these #defines are heinous for portability!
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
