"Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Yeah. I have no problem with access protection where it prevents
>> unintentional misuse and improves overall code clarity. However, this
>> seems like it doesn't fit that bill.
>
> Oh, it does IMHO. Once it is defined it can be reused in all such
> contexts.
You said "it doesn't change the usage syntax", but doesn't it? How to
do you make a recursive invocation which needs to specify something
where the default parameter appears?
BTW, I read your thing about exception-specs, but fail to see any
relationship.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
