Aleksey Gurtovoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Second thing: you can save yourself lots of typenames by taking
>> advantage of the way MPL lets you pass an uninstantiated metafunction,
>> without getting its nested ::type member, wherever a bool_c<...> is
>> expected:
>
> Uhm, that's not exactly correct. I would re-formulate it along these lines:
>
> To reduce the notational overhead imposed by the specifics of the
> compile-time domain, many of MPL metafunctions, when fully-curried (provided
> with all arguments), directly support the interface of the Integral Constant
> concept:
Yes, I was using shorthand. But I guess if we're putting together
tutorial WIKI pages, an accurate description is in order. Thanks.
-Dave
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
