From: "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] > > Was there ever any consideration/discussion on exposing some form of thread > > ID? (appart from the implicit ID in operator==) > > Yes... but I'm still trying to determine the requirements for that. If the only > usage for an ID is for comparison, and for diagnostic messages, then all that's > missing in the current proposed design is an operator<<(ostream). Otherwise, > what's missing is an id() method and an ID type.
I think that a reasonable requirement that we already mentioned several times is that the ID should be CopyConstructible, Assignable and LessThanComparable, for use in sets/maps. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
