> From: "Stefano Delli Ponti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I would dare to suggest that the "basic" thread class, if the thread concept > is supported, had _all_ of its methods available and implemented (or dummy) > for _all_ the platforms (!). > I would be inclined to have an "advanced" attribute like the one to make a > mutex visible across process boundaries available only on an "advanced" > class like process_mutex. The "basic" mutex, if the concept is supported, > could have the same signatures for all the platforms.
*All* of the proposed boost::thread::attribute values are optional. There are (at least in theory) platforms that don't support every single feature here. And the stack size/address are the only features that can probably always be ignored at run time. The rest can be make it or break it features at compile time. William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
