"William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> What
>> information do you *have* at the point of detection?
>
> Depends on numerous factors, such as the platform it's
> running on and how much time you want to spend
> gathering information. We could provide a stack trace,
> a memory dump, a listing of running processes, the OS
> name and version, and on and on.
Sorry, I meant what information do you have _portably_?
> This may sound facetious, but I'm frustrated asking the
> same question over and over again, and think this
> illustrates what I've been saying all along. To
> restate the question one more time: "What's the minimal
> amount of information that would be useful and
> portable?" Most of the above doesn't fit that
> billing...
No, I figured if you told us what information you could get portably,
we could narrow it down from there.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
