On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:30:36 -0500, David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Heck, you're right! The parser just gives a misleading error >> message. I found a much cleaner fix along these lines; testing now >> and will check in shortly. Thanks for the hint! >> >> Gennaro Prota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> <patch for iterator_adaptors> > >Done now. Seen :-) Yes, this way it's much cleaner. Incidentally, the problem of base class forwarding you had here is common but I didn't notice it was that problem when seeing bjam's output, I just saw that there were errors in files other than the one I modified and thought to ask you before trying further modifications and/or beginning speculating. Also, guessing in advance that it wasn't really a parsing problem would have been difficult, because Borland does have parsing problems (a simple example is in dynamic_bitset's constructor from basic_string, as you may see from the comments) Genny. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
