Hartmut,
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
First of all, let me say, that I'm very interested in trying to use your
program_options library for our ongoing Spirit based C preprocessor
sample. So I've looked at your code immidiatly after your announcement.
I plan to more thoroughly test your code and design,
That would be great!
but before that I had to correct some compilation errors:
cmd_line.hpp: 309: some missing std:: namespace qualifiers
Corrected.
config_file.hpp:79: a missing std:: namespace qualifiers
Corrected.
cmdline.cpp: 39: my compiler complains about a redefinition of the
default parameter
And your compiler is right.
cmdline.cpp: 164: void function may not return a value
Should be working as is, but corrected anyway.
cmdline.cpp: 577, 605: missing return statement at the end of a
non-void function (warning)
Not a problem, because all cases are handled in switch. I'll see if workaround
for the warning is possible.
config_file.cpp: #include <cassert> is missing
Corrected.
function_template.hpp: 324: void function may not return a value
Uhm... that's part of the function library... I believe it should be handling
void returns correctly. Do all compilers show this error?
parsers.hpp: 120, 121, 129, 130, 137, 138, 144, 145: missing std::
namespace qualifier
Corrected.
option_descriptions.cpp: 528: 'i' has already been declared in the
current scope (non-conforming compilers only)
Worked around. After all, this library should be usable mostly everywhere.
parsers.cpp: 180, 195: 'i' has already been declared in the current
scope (non-conforming compilers only)
Likewise.
After correcting these errors all compiles fine (I tried VC7.1,
IntelV7.0, Comeau 4.3.0.1).
Thanks for trying.
All the locations are updated. The summary of changes is in
http://zigzag.cs.msu.su:7813/program_options/127.txt
I still don't know what to do about function_template.hpp problem.
Thanks,
Volodya
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
