"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message b02kh4$7tp$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b02kh4$7tp$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > b02f0c$o1d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b02f0c$o1d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > It seems placement operator new (size_t, ...) would extend a lot > > garbage collection possibilities. Why don't we define a set of rules for > > each tag this overloaded placed operator would use: > > More logically, why don't you implement these yourself, and use > your implementation to justify the interface you design?
Already did. Cost / benefits are not good for operator new (size_t, os [ownership]). [...] > Probably, "gc_ptr<>" might be a better name. ... or maybe: shifted_ptr<int> = new (so) int(); displaced_ptr<int> = ...; ... Philippe A. Bouchard _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
