"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message b04n9f$ik2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b04n9f$ik2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [...] I don't see any documentation, except for what few > comments exist in the source. It isn't clear where you expect people to > use your pointer, or if there are usages that should be discouraged. You > don't mention any gotchas that might occur. These are things that should > appear in the docs (which you will certainly need if you intend to submit it > for review). Basically, it's hard to comment on your design without > spending a lot of time reviewing the code. Docs would help. ;) You're perfectly right. I guess I was more focusing on the design before documenting it. > [...] I don't see the source for your test. Why don't you include that, so > people can compile and run it under different compilers and platforms? I'll clean the folder up but it was basically copied from placed_ptr/. > [...] The comparison with shared_ptr<> isn't fair. Your ptr has no locking > for thread safety. Try defining BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS and > re-running the tests, or you risk just measuring the speed of thread sync. I'll work on this but the non-locking version should be okay. Philippe A. Bouchard _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
