"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > > We received some resistance from some developers > > claiming it was too complex. But in my view, if you > > don't want to look inside, the typedefs are simple > > enough, just use them. > > We don't have typedef templates; you must mean > something else > [...]
I suspect that what he means is, for a given T, create a typedef of the smart pointer specialized on T. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
