> My feeling is that the boost community would of course be interested in > looking over a related submission, but most of its members are not > interested in actively working on such a port. And let's face it, I'm not > popular with boost, and that doesn't help generating enthusiasm inside boost > :o). I don't have the time to work on a port, and the way things are shaping > up, it seems like I'll never have. In the meantime, there is of course some > cross-polination going on.
Unfortunately I am very bust at the moment and was not able to participate in the discussion (even though I initiated it by presenting policy based solution for different task), I would like to remind that exist at least 2 attempts (my and Dave) out there for boostified pbsp. Both are pretty close to complete state. Including suport for boost::shared_ptr functionality. I really want to complete this work and will try to do so in a couple month. I know that Dave also working more or less actively on his version. So I don't think we too far from real submission to boost. Gennadiy. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
