I have noticed that constant static local variables were preventing member functions to be inlined under gcc 2.95. Now fixed. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/shifted_ptr.zip
Now, it's been a while I did not worked on any locking mechanism but if I am accessing one counter and the increment instruction is atomic, why would I need to lock anything? Philippe A. Bouchard _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
