Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Review results: Optional library

[Beman Dawes]

At 02:21 PM 1/23/2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>
>"William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Fernando Cacciola said:
>> > "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> Fernando Cacciola said:
>> >> However, shouldn't you be using "run" instead of
>> >> "unit-test" in the Jamfile?
>> >>
>> > Yes :-) I was looking at the wrong examples.
>> >
>> > Fixed now. (could you re-test it?)
>>
>> $ bjam
>> Jamfile: line 25: syntax error at keyword ;
>> Jamfile: line 25: syntax error at keyword ;
>> Jamfile: line 26: syntax error at keyword }
>> Jamfile: line 26: syntax error at keyword }
>> ....found 8 targets...
>>
>It looks like the syntax for the compile-fail (plus the <define>) is
>wrong...
>I've removed the fail cases altogether until I can test it myself so I
>don't
>abuse anymore of your time.
>It runs only the ordinary test now
>It should work I think.

Yes, works here. I've added optional to the status/Jamfile.

Always keep in mind that the jam language is whitespace sensitive. I can't tell you how many times that caught me at first, although I got used to it after awhile.

--Beman


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost