From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > And I'm even less wrong if the sink is > > > > px.reset(new X); > > > > since "basic guarantee" here says nothing about px after the exception. The > > exception safety of this construct has no name, it's somewhere between basic > > and strong. > > Not sure what you expect the behavior to be in the face of an > exception, but I can't see why you say that neither named guarantee > applies here.
The behavior, at least in shared_ptr's case, is that the pointer is deleted, but there are no other effects, i.e. px is left unchanged. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
