Jeremy Siek wrote:
Hi Volodya,
No reason in particular for the spelling. I'm sorry it is confusing, but
it is a bit late to change this now.
Jason House wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the details, but could there be a typedef or
> something like that in order to accept bidirectedS?
> Or maybe replacing the bidirectionalS with bidirectedS and making
> bidirectionalS typedef'd to bidirectedS?
Hmm.. had the same thought. It might not worth the trouble to go though
all documentation changing names, but OTOH hand it's not that hard with emacs :-/
P.S. In LEDA "bidirected" means something different than what
"bidirectional" means in the BGL.
Yea, you're right. What did you expect from a person who never used
LEDA in practice? ;-)
- Volodya
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
