> I see that you haven't replied to this for long time now. So either > you are bored from the question, or it wasn't clear enough. To see if > it is the second case I thought to reformulate it:
Well only for a day and a bit, sorry just busy :-( > Can you show, with an example, why the code used for named template > arguments can't reasonably use an expression? It doesn't have access to one, only a type: the usage is take some template parameter, see if it is convertible to some policy type, and if it is, then extract the policy information. John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
