From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've taken the liberty to convert the patch into detail/quick_allocator.hpp. > > #define BOOST_SP_USE_QUICK_ALLOCATOR to make shared_ptr use it. > > shared_ptr_alloc_test.cpp has been updated, too. You can now compare > > quick_allocator vs SGI std::allocator yourself. :-) > > I'm not all set up to run those tests and measure the times, which is > why I was hoping Philippe would check it out.
There is a test in libs/smart_ptr/test called shared_ptr_alloc_test.cpp that you can use. > > quick_allocator doesn't compile on VC6 or Borland 5.5.1, though. I haven't > > investigated too deeply. > > You must have changed the code I sent then. Works fine with VC6 for > me; borland has the usual problems with ICEs and scope qualification. I did. > This was just a quick hack; I'm surprised you thought it was worthwhile > modifying your sources to accomodate it despite the lack of *any* test > data... The modification to shared_count.hpp is small and macro-guarded, so it won't affect existing code. Seeing how well a "quick hack" performs can be valuable information, given how often the "optimized count allocator" question comes up. > or did you try it? This is almost an insult. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
