On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 08:53 PM, Greg Colvin wrote:
Agreed on all points. And glad to have your continued support for a better tomorrow (which you have expressed repeatedly, not just now). I like to think of auto_ptr as a bright headlight into the future. I have learned so much from it.Sigh...To be clear, I'll be happy to see a better syntax in the next standard -- auto_ptr was the best we could do with the syntax we had, but ...
Imho, standardized move syntax/semantics is very close to the top of important issues for C++. I guess that's why I'm pushing for current smart pointers to get "the right syntax" for move semantics.
Thanks,
-Howard
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
