"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

> > "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > We did consider iterator adaptors when we started.  The main problem is
that
> > we have more iterators based on two iterators, rather than on one -- I
don't
> > know whether we can benefit from iterator adaptors in this case.  Can
we?
>
> Usually.

In this case we will re-evaluate this issue.

Arkadiy



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to