"Jason Shirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] oft.com... > [...] > If you aren't getting reasonably prompt responses to questions like > this on MS newsgroups, send me a private email and I'll definitely > follow up.
Thanks for the offer. > [...] > As usual, you are absolutely correct. Backwards compatibility in > our object model is critical. I seriously doubt we'll ever do the > ZBO by default. > [...] What can you say about empty member optimization in VC6.5 and later? Also, do you have any idea why an empty class that inherits from non-empty bases would be bigger than the sum of the size of the bases? Obviously, trivial test cases do not show this behaviour, but the policy_ptr in the sandbox does (though you'll probably have to wait till Monday afternoon for me to check in the latest version). Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
