"Gennaro Prota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:25:52 -0500, "Dave Abrahams" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >In that case it would seem likely that it could be fixed by reverting to > >C-style cast, no? > > I've seen in the CVS that the casts are to support enums. But the > documentation for integral_c says > > An Integral Constant is a class (or a template class) > that represents a value of a built-in integral type > > Enumerations are not integral types. Also, the presence of next and > prior exposes the use with enumerators to undefined behavior. Do we > really want that? > > Good point, however, I think that the *intent* of 'integral_c' is to represent values that are 'integral constant expressions', which paricularly includes enumerations besides ordinary integral type values.
-- Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
