Peter Dimov wrote: > > Paul Mensonides wrote: > > > > [deep breath] > > > > I think that he thought that you might have thought that the > > cv-qualified specializations would match > > pointers-to-cv-qualified-member-functions rather than just > > cv-qualified-pointers-to-members. > > Yes, exactly. Apologies for the confusion. It is a common mistake to provide > only R T::* and expect that to match all pointers to members. To get back to > your earlier post, > > int (X::*pf) () const; > > is not the same as > > typedef int (*F) () const; > typedef F X::* pf; > > since the first typedef is ill-formed, function types cannot be > cv-qualified.
The standard seems to disagree, see 9.3.1/9. Or is it just pointers-to-functions against pointer-to-member-functions? > Either way, it seems that you meant what you said, i.e. cv-qualified > pointers to members. Sorry for the noise. No problem, I just wanted to make sure I don't miss some important point.. Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], web: http://www.aixigo.de _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
