"Dave Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 04dc01c2cd3a$219279c0$7901a8c0@penguin">news:04dc01c2cd3a$219279c0$7901a8c0@penguin... > [...] > Lots of ways. For example, the smart pointer objects could be > bigger than neccessary.
;) I'm working on it! > [...] > Type generators are overkill, since unlike with iterator adaptors > there's no need to preserve type identity. Normal inheritance will > work just fine. That's a good point. Do you think public inheritance is ok, or should private be used? Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
