[2003-02-07] Alisdair Meredith wrote: >Rene Rivera wrote: > >> Don't know if different people ran it or not. But it is simply that one has >> a different file name, from an old run, and the table is sorted strictly on >> the file name of the results. > >If the old run is no longer relevent (as run date October 17 suggests) >who would be responsible for removing it?
I would think the person who ran the test, or Beman, or David, or any admin, etc. >> I've been trying to figure out a good way to show that some test are newer >> than others, because sorting by date is not possible, and I like that >> suggestion very much :-] I'd prefer a bit more granularity than you suggest >> though. How'bout this: >> >> GREEN -- tests ran in the last 48 hours. >> YELLOW -- tests ran in the last 7 days. >> RED -- tests ran in the last 14 days. >> BLACK -- tests are older than 14 days. > >I tend to like default (black) text to indicate there is no error, and >only colour-code things that need attention. In your scheme it is the >reverse, black being an 'abandoned' test suite. Ah, sorry that was my mistake. I really meant to keep your colors with just the changed increments :-\ -- So it would be BLACK for 48 hours, and so on. -- grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 102708583@icq _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
