Again, a nasty case of patching the tests rather than the library :¬ ( It appears borland ADL is not up to the task of handling the interval library test cases. Looking at the fail lists, I suspect it is not the only compiler to suffer.
I suggest adding another boost defect: BOOST_BROKEN_ADL (or similar) and in the Interval library test cpps adding the three lines #if defined( BOOST_BROKEN_ADL ) using namespace boost::numeric::interval_lib; #endif before the main code starts. I have not tested extensively, but borland now passes the test cases I have converted. In any event, it is now testing the interval library, rather than ADL rules ;¬ ) -- AlisdairM _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
