As I've asked in a recent post, I would like to have boost not using non-standard features (e.g. long long), unless they are explicitly requested by the user. The reason, besides general boost philosophy considerations, is that, with some compilers, it is otherwise impossible to compile code that includes boost headers, even if the client code makes no use of the offending feature. For instance, Intel C++ 6.0 in --strict mode flags any use of long long with an error, and the obvious -Qoption,c,--long_long isn't accepted (maybe there's an alternative for it though, I don't know).
Could we subordinate BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG to defined(BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG)? Genny. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
