On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:32:11 -0600, Aleksey Gurtovoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I proposed to split "utility.hpp" header a >long time ago, and there was a general agreement, but it was postponed until >the release is out, and I never got to doing it after that - even although >Beman posted a reminder about it >(http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg18289.php). > >I'll do it sometime this week. Good news :-) Shooting for Pluto: could we put all the "utilities" in boost/ instead of boost/utility/ ? PS: please, don't invoke backward compatibility to preserve an error; it takes more time to remember what headers are in the utility directory and thus are to be included with #include "boost/utility/..." rather than eliminating "utility/" from the existing #includes once for all. Genny. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
