On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:40:20 -0000, "John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, the title says it all :-) I would like to have a separate source >> file for the ubiquitous BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT. I have several files >> that use BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT but no real config macro. For those >> ones, I currently have something like >> >> #include "boost/config.hpp" // for BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT >> >> Wouldn't >> >> #include "boost/config/static_constant.hpp" >> >> be preferable? > >Yes Ok, you've said "yes"! > but BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT is dependent upon the config, even if the rest >of your code is not, sorry :-/ Which is what I said in reply to Gustavo. That doesn't mean that you have to include boost/config *instead* of static_constant.hpp. Genny. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
