"Boris Schäling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > Noone knows as there is no consensus on how the library's > architecture should look like. There are different approaches and > proposals at Boost Wiki and in the sandbox but what's still missing > is the big picture. As far as there are no ideas of how to get a > reasonable model which incorporates different things like > blocking/non-blocking/multiplexing/asynchronous/extensible... there > won't be much progress. I've been thinking about that and hope to > come up with an idea in a few days.
How about borrowing ideas from ACE, but implementing them in modern C++? Or has that been discussed already? Or is the ACE framework too obsolete-C++ to be a useful design? Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost