Neal D. Becker wrote: > On Friday 14 February 2003 10:09 am, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Neal D. Becker wrote: > > > > or from somewhere else? I've looked at those and source rpm does > > > > include "boost-build.jam" > > > > > > Which rpm? > > > > > > rpm -q boost-jam > > > boost-jam-3.1.3-1 > > > > > > rpm -q -l boost-jam | grep boost-build > > > [silence] > > > > > > rpm -q -l boost | grep boost-build > > > [nothing] > > > > > > rpm -q -l boost-devel | grep boost-build > > > [nadda] > > > > > > BTW, I just rebuilt using boost-1.29.0-2.src.rpm > > > > And that package should include big tar file, with entire Boost source > > tree. This is what is needed. > > Oh, I see. But this doesn't get installed by any RPM. Should it? What is > the minimum needed to install in order to be able to play with 3rd party > boost packages?
I'm afraid that full tree is needed now and I'm not sure what can be done about it now. I think that for Boost.Build V2 will just have a separate rpm which would allow building 3rd party packages. This might be possible with V1, although I'm not sure I have the time (and access to Redhat box ;-) ) > Should boost-devel install the whole boost source tree somewhere? That's a question for Malte. Although typically, -devel packages install only headers. - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
