"Rozental, Gennadiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > I could not afford boost::function dependency in so low level > component as execution_monitor (or even unit_test_monitor). If we > will be able to design it as pluggable extension to Boost.Test I would > of course prefer the way you implemented it in Boost.Python with > boost::function0<void> argument. > [...]
I second this point. I had a problem with shared_ptr<> visibility in a policy_ptr test. It would be nice if Boost.Test relied on as few other libraries as possible. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
