Daniel Frey wrote: > typedef test::remove_pointer< int A::* >::type t1; > typedef test::remove_pointer< int A::* const >::type t2; > typedef test::remove_pointer< int A::* volatile >::type t3; > typedef test::remove_pointer< int A::* const volatile >::type t4; > > typedef test::add_const< int( int ) >::type t5; > typedef test::add_volatile< int( int ) >::type t6; > typedef test::add_cv< int( int ) >::type t7;
Why do you expect these to work? > typedef char t8[ test::is_convertible< double, int >::value ]; > typedef char t9[ !test::is_class< int( int ) >::value ]; > typedef char t10[ !test::is_enum< int( int ) >::value ]; These should work. If they don't, the implementation is broken. :-) _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
