> See also the discussion about a "general coding guideline" to "always > provide a name for template parameters". Here, the maintainer already > did the right thing when he received the patch.
If the maintainer hid the compiler brokenness completely, then they did the wrong thing. If they didn't, they used an #ifdef (via BOOST_WORKAROUND). Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
