[boost] Re: Re: Formal review of Variant Library (Ed B.)

[Eric Friedman]

Peter Dimov wrote:
[snip]
> Destroying a const object is fine, but there is no reason to have a const
in
> the argument.
>
> template<class T> void call_destructor(T & t) { t.~T(); }
>
> X const x;
>
> f(x); // OK, T = X const
>
> f(5); // compile-time fail

Good point. Even though the class is in the detail namespace, I think it's a
good change to make.

Thanks,
Eric



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost