"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some Boost libraries test for __BORLANDC__ defined and proceed to use > illegal constructs under the asumption that the compiler is Borland 5.x. > This is wrong. Comeau C++, when using Borland as backend, also defines > __BORLANDC__ (currently as 0x540). > > I have fixed is_pointer and is_reference since they prevented me from > compiling shared_ptr_alloc_test.cpp, but please review your code for other > hidden __BORLANDC__ assumptions.
Gack! Do we need a BOOST_BORLAND #define to go with our BOOST_MSVC? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
