On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Eric Friedman wrote:
> Ronald Garcia wrote: > > In addition, compiling with Intel C++ 7.0 under strict ansi compliance > > (-ansi) revealed the following nits as well: > [snip] > > I've enclosed patches (unified diffs) for these. > > Are any of these errors severe, hindering you (or others) from review? Or > can fixes wait? > These fixes can wait for me. It appears that most compilers aren't affected (EDG-based compilers only seem to complain in strict moce). Cheers, Ron _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
