Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 08:34 AM 2/25/2003, David Abrahams wrote: > > >Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Go ahead and make the change, unless someone voices an objection. > >> > >> I'm wondering how may other places we have similar problems? > > > >Now you know why I've been making such a stink about insidious ADL! > > > >> Is there any programatic way to detect them? > > > >I've been trying to get compiler vendors to add a warning for names to > >which ADL applies but which are found in the local namespace. This, > >at least, would give us a way to detect likely candidates. No takers > >yet :(. > > Hum, it looks like Microsoft took you up on it.
Well, it was MS I was haranguing most-loudly about it. > See the shared_ptr_test warning on the VC++ 7.1 beta regression > test. I've seen that. It's a different warning IIUC. Doesn't it go off whether or not you find the overload in the same namespace the search started from? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
