Could it not just be called shared. After all it is merely a more general term of shared_ptr. And the type of the resource kind of makes it implicit.
e.g. shared<file> is a shared file. crystal. Though this doesn't fit at all with non sharing policies. Sam Alisdair Meredith wrote: > Larry Evans wrote: > >> Would the GOF name, proxy, be too non-specific? Policy names might >> provide the specifics (whether it's a pointer or a resource). > > Proxy, if anything, sends the wrong message to me. The name suggests > 'reference', rather then 'owner' > > 'bookkeeper' is the best I can come up with so far, but that is a very > odd word to type <g> and still too long. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
