> > So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource<>, or just > > managed<>. > > Why not just resource<>? Management is implied anyway; that's the > reason for the existence of the class.
*laugh* I was thinking exactly the opposite. To me, the resource itself is clear from the template parameter -- it's the management that needs to be indicated. +1 for managed<>. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
