David Abrahams wrote: > Dave Gomboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>> So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource<>, or >>>> just managed<>. >>> >>> Why not just resource<>? Management is implied anyway; that's the >>> reason for the existence of the class. >> >> *laugh* I was thinking exactly the opposite. To me, the resource >> itself is clear from the template parameter -- it's the management >> that needs to be indicated. >> >> +1 for managed<>. > > I'm with Dave G. on this one. resource<lock> doesn't tell me > anything; I already know that every lock is a resource.
Yes, but not all resources are locks. -- Joel de Guzman joel at boost-consulting.com http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
