David Abrahams wrote: > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I would like some feedback about the logic behind it. > > Do you have a use-case for this?
Sorry, I do not understand; you mean someone that would want to use it this way? I am not sure, but it would be better for continous optional<>s this way? -- Philippe A. Bouchard _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
