John Maddock wrote: > I don't know, it seems to be a really weird compiler bug, because adding > extra parenthesis around a > expression doesn't help.
I think it is a parser/lexer issue, where the '<' and '>' tokens are taken for template syntax rather than boolean comparison. Adding parens does not fix the problem whereas changing the token to <= or >= does (hence my 'fix') I am wondering if the best place to record this sort of library-specific workaround might be on the Wiki? Potentially every test/file might merit comments some some compiler combination, and it is certainly beyond the scope of the library authors to maintain up-to-date documentation of workarounds for every compiler ever. -- AlisdairM Team Thai Kingdom _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
