Garnet Kin-Lic Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear all, > there have been a few discussions recently about the status of > solaris and boost. as someone whose code relies on the boost::function and > boost::bind libraries, and who needs to port to solaris in the very near > future, i'm happy to try and help. does anyone know what is needed,
The mission: find workarounds for the compiler bugs which cause errors when you run bjam in the status subdirectory. > and has anyone had any experience with version 7 of the sun > compilers? I don't remember which version I was testing with. Their version numbering scheme is confusing and doesn't follow their preprocessor symbol numbering. > anyone else interested? i seem to recall a message from > dave abrahams saying it was a miserable experience - sincerely, It was. I was testing with the release version of their compiler. They've been saying their pre-release compiler (downloadable from their site) is much better and has been tuned to work with Boost, but so far I have no confirmation of that. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
