> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 10:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [boost] Re: I/O library formal review > > > * newl needs a bit more rationale. How is cout << newl different from > cout > > << '\n'? How is it better? > > Maybe newl does not reset the manipulators? If it true it should be spelled > out explicitly. In any case I also like to see an example where newl is > preferable to << '\n'.
Is there a speed advantage - because flush is quite expensive? We should have some evidence for this? Paul _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
