"Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yes, what I cannot figure out is whether the "Preliminary submission" > step can be reached with a non boostified libary (like mine is now) or > whether it is assumed the library should be Boost-friendly by this stage. I'd say 6 or 7 people expressing interest is more than enough to justify Boostifying the code at this stage. However, I would like to see what your latest version looks like, and see if we can't perhaps redesign some of the features that run afoul of non-standard C++. Also, it looks like the early consensus is that multi-key/value support is desired, so I think we should have a good look at your implementation/design to see if it is general enough. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
